Telegram removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
- Traqeer
Messages, channels and groups must be counted separately.
Read the cases and sources →The creator decision guide · November 2026
OnlyFans DMCA takedown: compare the best services
Compare Telegram takedowns, social-platform removals and impersonation protection. Inspect published creator cases, plan limits and the supporting Google record.
Compare the platform evidence ↗Answer in brief
Start with the outcome you need.
The provisional shortlists identify the most useful published cases to inspect. No provider has a comparable, independently verified outcome dataset across all three channels in this review. Google supports the research but does not determine the platform order.
Compare by removal outcome
Telegram, social posts and fake accounts.
Choose the category that matches the problem. Start with the published cases, then check coverage and plan limits.
Social-platform removal
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Posts, media items and disabled accounts are different outcomes; report each platform separately.
Read the cases and sources →Impersonation account removal
- BranditScan
- Ceartas
- Fanlock
Count verified fake-account disabling separately from copied-post removal.
Read the cases and sources →Providers are listed alphabetically, without numbered positions or category winners. Comparable performance evidence is not available. Other providers remain in the coverage comparison; missing published cases do not demonstrate poor service. Google is supporting evidence only.
Supporting Google evidence
The historical Google benchmark.
Google removal evidence through November 4, 2026. Reviewed November 8, 2026.
Mean and median owner outcomes. This guide considers both the average and the median recorded-owner total, reducing dependence on the average alone. Fanlock leads this particular weighted Google model with 73.75 / 75 points. This does not establish performance on Telegram, social platforms or impersonation cases.
Mean removals per recorded owner carry 30 points, median owner removals 20, removal percentage 25, and total removals 0. The remaining 25 points for reviews, documented comparative switching outcomes and measured platform turnaround are unscored.
Different Google metrics, different leaders
Among these nine services in the supplied all-time snapshot. These are search-delisting measures, not category winners for Telegram, social platforms or impersonation.
Highest mean removals per recorded owner
Fanlock
32,128 URL occurrences
Highest removed-to-submitted percentage
Leakless
95.66%
Largest total removal volume
BranditScan
331,614,833 URL occurrences
Recorded owner IDs are not verified individual creators; counts can include repeated URLs. Customer mix, case difficulty and time in service differ. The weighted benchmark below combines these measures under the disclosed formula.
| Rank / service | Mean removed / owner ID | Median removed / owner ID | Removed / submitted | Total removed | Points / 75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Fanlock Read analysis | 32,128 | 19,287 | 95.01% | 9,092,241 | 73.75 |
| 2 BranditScan Read analysis | 17,482 | 2,324 | 62.84% | 331,614,833 | 34.44 |
| 3 Traqeer Read analysis | 4,389 | 1,173.5 | 94.43% | 2,765,285 | 28.92 |
| 4 Ceartas Read analysis | 9,098 | 1,013.5 | 76.50% | 54,424,314 | 28.67 |
| 5 Rulta Read analysis | 7,818 | 1,201 | 72.82% | 172,833,764 | 26.75 |
| 6 Leakless Read analysis | 765 | 289.5 | 95.66% | 111,744 | 24.93 |
| 7 Bruqi Read analysis | 9,816 | 2,837 | 49.26% | 34,208,539 | 24.42 |
| 8 Sidenty Read analysis | 1,246 | 9 | 82.72% | 1,572,040 | 21.85 |
| 9 Lock Leaks Read analysis | 2,217 | 550 | 72.28% | 250,563 | 20.71 |
“Owner” means a recorded Google copyright-owner ID, not a verified unique creator. Counts are URL occurrences; they are not unique files or confirmed source-site deletions. Means are rounded for display; scores use unrounded data. This is a weighted ranking, so it does not sort strictly by the first column.
See the formula and denominator · Check every reporting entity · Google’s report definitions
50% Per-owner removals
30% mean + 20% median25% Removal rate10% Reviews · pending5% Switch outcomes · pending10% Turnaround · pending0% Total removals
30% mean + 20% median25% Removal rate10% Reviews · pending5% Switch outcomes · pending10% Turnaround · pending0% Total removals
Make the comparison useful
Give every handoff an owner.
Agree who finds the URL, confirms authority to act, submits the request and checks the outcome. Keep rejections and unresolved cases visible. For an agency, record these responsibilities separately for every creator and make the history exportable.
Check 01Clear onboarding requirements
Check 02Assisted notice preparation
Check 03Readable progress updates
Check 04Defined follow-up process
Prepare
Ask what ownership and authorization information the provider needs and how it will protect that information.
Submit
Ask how the service selects the destination, checks the request, and records the submission.
Follow through
Agree who handles rejections, repeat uploads, and cases that remain unresolved.
Read beyond the position
Provider notes: the supporting Google results.
Every service has a measurable strength and a limitation worth checking.
9 services shown.
01
Fanlock
73.75 / 75 Google pointsHighest mean and median removals per recorded owner in this cohort, with a 95.01% removal rate. It leads when per-owner output receives the largest weight.
283Recorded owner IDs
19,287Median removed / owner
95.01%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The denominator is 283 recorded owner IDs. These are not independently verified unique paying creators, and the observed reporting history begins in February 2026.
Public creator evidence: The supplied blossom_moonlight story favors Fanlock over Rulta. A public Sailor Scholar review also describes a positive experience. Neither establishes an audited comparative result.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2026-02-01 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Fanlock ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
02
BranditScan
34.44 / 75 Google pointsLargest total Google removal volume in the cohort and the second-highest mean per recorded owner. Those strengths support its position in the weighted benchmark.
18,969Recorded owner IDs
2,324Median removed / owner
62.84%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its all-time removal rate is 62.84%. The large and longer-lived reporting pool is not directly comparable to a small creator roster without considering tenure and client mix.
Public creator evidence: The website features creators including Brandi Love, Kira Noir and Aria Lee. Featured names and promotional result counts do not establish current subscriptions or follower counts.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2020-10-07 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit BranditScan ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
03
Traqeer
28.92 / 75 Google pointsA 94.43% removal rate supports its weighted result, alongside 4,389 mean removals per recorded owner.
630Recorded owner IDs
1,173.5Median removed / owner
94.43%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its total recorded removal volume is smaller than the largest providers. Provider-published audience counts for featured creators have not been independently verified.
Public creator evidence: Traqeer features Karol Rosado, Patty Lopez, Criss Geithner and Itstereels. Karol Rosado records overlap BranditScan activity near the end of the snapshot.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2022-06-11 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Traqeer ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
04
Ceartas
28.67 / 75 Google pointsA 76.50% removal rate and 9,098 mean removals per recorded owner support Ceartas in the weighted benchmark.
5,982Recorded owner IDs
1,013.5Median removed / owner
76.50%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The 1,013.5 median is substantially below the mean, indicating an uneven distribution. Its creator-collective and agency case claims use measures that are separate from this Google dataset.
Public creator evidence: Ceartas features Sidemen, Belle_OHaraXXX and other creators. SweetieFox also appears in its Google records; overlapping Fanlock activity does not establish an exclusive move.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2021-04-15 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Ceartas ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
05
Rulta
26.75 / 75 Google pointsSecond-largest total removal volume in the cohort, with 7,818 mean removals per recorded owner and a 72.82% removal rate.
22,106Recorded owner IDs
1,201Median removed / owner
72.82%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its 22,106 recorded owner IDs form the largest denominator here. Long-lived and mixed owner records can pull an all-time average away from the experience of an active individual creator.
Public creator evidence: Sophie Rain appears under Rulta in the selected Google profiles. Historical Pinkchyu and overlapping Athena Kami records also appear; these associations are not endorsements.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2018-10-26 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Rulta ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
06
Leakless
24.93 / 75 Google pointsHighest all-time removal percentage in this cohort at 95.66%. This is a useful distinction for readers prioritizing that single measure.
146Recorded owner IDs
289.5Median removed / owner
95.66%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: It has 111,744 recorded removals across 146 owner IDs, giving a mean of 765. Its smaller observed volume limits what the high percentage alone can tell us.
Public creator evidence: Image testimonials and interface result cards were not resolved into sufficiently clear creator identities for review scoring.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2025-11-29 to 2026-10-10. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Leakless ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
07
Bruqi
24.42 / 75 Google pointsThird-highest mean removals per recorded owner at 9,816, ahead of Ceartas and Rulta on that single measure.
3,485Recorded owner IDs
2,837Median removed / owner
49.26%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: Its 49.26% all-time removal rate reduces its weighted score. A different weighting would change the order; the published formula makes that tradeoff explicit.
Public creator evidence: Featured names include Thicky Tatiana and Ava Louise. Likes shown in some testimonials are not follower counts and receive no audience-size bonus.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2023-06-20 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Bruqi ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
08
Sidenty
21.85 / 75 Google pointsAn 82.72% removal rate and 1,246 mean removals per recorded owner provide a measurable Google reporting record.
1,262Recorded owner IDs
9Median removed / owner
82.72%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The median is 9 removals per recorded owner, far below the mean. This distribution makes the average a particularly limited description of a typical owner record.
Public creator evidence: Pinkchyu appears in historical Sidenty records. Named testimonials were not readable on the checked creator page, so no review conclusion is drawn from their absence.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2022-01-18 to 2026-11-04. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Sidenty ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
09
Lock Leaks
20.71 / 75 Google pointsThe all-time snapshot contains 250,563 removals, averaging 2,217 per recorded owner, with a 72.28% removal rate.
113Recorded owner IDs
550Median removed / owner
72.28%Removed / all submitted
Interpretation: The cohort contains 113 owner IDs. A higher rate in the recent-window analysis is a different measure and is not substituted into this all-time ranking.
Public creator evidence: The Ms Luna interface was treated as a product demonstration, not a verified customer. The agency page could not be retrieved during this review.
Measured platform turnaround: unavailable. Observation window: 2023-11-28 to 2026-10-29. Google categories and entity mappings are in the evidence register.
Visit Lock Leaks ↗ · Primary Google reporting profile · Full mapping and counts
Creator names, audiences and service histories
Who appears in the public records?
These reporting associations answer a narrower question than “who is a current customer?” They show which selected service submitted Google requests for a matching owner name. Audience figures below are third-party counters and are not yet applied to scores.
| Creator / audience evidence | Services in the selected Google profiles | What we can conclude |
|---|---|---|
| Sophie Rain 8,895,533 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-11-06 | Rulta 2023-06-20 → 2026-11-03 | Rulta filings run from June 2023 through November 3, 2026. Other submitters, including profiles named Sophie Rain, also appear; they are not authenticated clients or confirmed moves. |
| SweetieFox 4,634,414 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated | Ceartas 2024-11-01 → 2026-11-03 Fanlock 2026-02-06 → 2026-11-03 | Fanlock starts in February 2026, but Ceartas and Fanlock both file through November 3. No evidence in these dates that SweetieFox left Ceartas. |
| Athena Kami 1,589,192 Instagram followers Audience source · 2026-10-26 Suffix variants are shown separately and are not added to the exact-name total. | Ceartas 2026-03-08 → 2026-05-22 Fanlock 2026-05-16 → 2026-11-03 Rulta 2026-10-29 → 2026-11-03 | Ceartas filings end May 22, 2026; Fanlock starts May 16. Rulta starts October 29 while Fanlock continues through November 3. Possible additional or changing representation; no exclusive switch established. |
| Pinkychu 647,077 Instagram followers Audience source · snapshot date not stated Pinkychu is the user-corrected lookup spelling. Pinkchyu is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. Google owner IDs 6247316 and 593882 differ; the identity link has not been independently verified. | Sidenty 2023-11-06 → 2024-03-18 Rulta 2024-06-15 → 2026-09-14 Ceartas 2025-06-09 → 2026-01-18 Fanlock 2026-05-18 → 2026-11-03 | The corrected spelling Pinkychu matches Fanlock owner ID 6247316: May 18–November 3, 2026. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu matches owner ID 593882 under Sidenty, Rulta and Ceartas. If these are the same creator, Fanlock overlaps Rulta through September 14; no exclusive switch is established. The cross-spelling identity link is user-supplied, not independently verified. |
Corrected creator lookup
Pinkychu · Fanlock
73,279 removed / 74,783 submitted · 97.99%, across 316 requests from 2026-05-18 to 2026-11-03.
Reporter 2529688 / owner 6247316. The earlier spelling Pinkchyu uses owner 593882 and is retained as a user-linked candidate alias. The identity link is not independently verified. These requests were already included in Fanlock’s aggregate, so the correction does not change the service ranking. Google reporting profile.
Sophie Rain’s records show Rulta in this nine-service cohort. SweetieFox has overlapping Ceartas and Fanlock activity. Athena Kami has Ceartas, Fanlock and later Rulta activity, including overlap. None establishes a confirmed exclusive switch or the reason for one.
See exact creator totals, dates and owner IDs · Download all 83 creator/service rows
Public feedback, not interviews
Creator reviews add context.
blossom_moonlight
User-supplied Instagram story · visible handle @blossom_in_my_moonlight · original post date unknown
“@fanlockcom done WONDERS for takedowns”
“Better than Rulta ONG)”
The visible story expresses a preference for Fanlock over Rulta. The claimed Fansly top-100 status, link between handles and commercial relationship are unverified. No interview was conducted.
Rulta and Fanlock overlap from August 30 to October 10, 2026. The supplied story favors Fanlock, but cancellation and a dated switch are unconfirmed.
Sailor Scholar
Public Trustpilot review · April 12, 2026 · experience dated April 11
The reviewer describes an X removal in under 24 hours and a positive Fanlock experience. This is a single reviewer-reported case, not a measured platform turnaround average.
Google records also show earlier BranditScan and Rulta activity. The review does not name a prior provider or establish a comparative switch outcome.
Read the public review profileFeatured creators and audience size
The register covers 86 selected names, with 63 usable name matches in the selected Google profiles. A website feature is not automatically a review, a current client relationship or proof of audience size.
| Service | Names recorded from its site | Audience evidence status |
|---|---|---|
| BranditScan | 31 · Mz.Dani, Noah Bensi, lilcanadiangirl, Zada Marquez… | Published removal counts are not follower counts. |
| Bruqi | 10 · Madeline-Mai Davies, Drip, Thicky Tatiana, Lexnstuff… | Some published values are likes, not followers. |
| Ceartas | 8 · Sidemen, rhiansuggers, liam_fitzgerald, kateshelor… | Sidemen: about 23.4M YouTube subscribers from a secondary counter; collective, not an agency roster. |
| Fanlock | 14 · BriSolo, NatyLikesPizza, RexChu, MissMercyy… | Provider-claimed audience sizes; direct identity and count checks pending. |
| Rulta | 14 · Katiedomsyou_, MstrssTs, libertyvalentine, Lustfullibertines… | Comparable follower counts not verified. |
| Traqeer | 4 · Karol Rosado, Patty Lopez, Criss Geithner, Itstereels | Provider-claimed audience sizes; direct identity and count checks pending. |
Leakless image testimonials require clearer identification; Sidenty’s named reviews were not readable in the checked page; Lock Leaks’ Ms Luna interface is a product demonstration. These gaps are not evidence that a service has no customers.
View all featured names, source pages and audience claims · How audience weighting will work
Platform turnaround
Speed needs outcome timestamps.
No comparable, independently measured platform turnaround is available for Fanlock, BranditScan, Ceartas, Rulta, Traqeer, Bruqi, Leakless, Sidenty or Lock Leaks in this evidence set. Google submission dates do not show when a platform completed a removal.
The proposed current platform model assigns 15% to measured turnaround; it remains unscored. Marketing estimates and single-review experiences are recorded as claims, not converted into average response times.
StartRecord a valid submission timestamp.
FinishVerify the outcome and its timestamp.
SeparateGroup Google, hosts and social platforms.
IncludeKeep pending and failed cases in view.
Read the outcome correctly
A search result and a source file are separate.
A Google removal is evidence about search visibility. It is not confirmation that the hosting site deleted the material. Ask for separate reports of submitted requests, verified outcomes and cases still pending.
Your buying checklist
Five questions.
A clearer decision.
Keep the answers alongside the comparison. A service’s observed results and the plan it offers you are different parts of the decision.
Your selections stay in this browser. No URLs, files or personal information are requested.
0 of 5 questions reviewed.
Common questions
Before you choose.
Can an agency simply submit for every creator?
An agency should establish and record its authority to act for each creator. Ask the provider how authorization is collected and kept current.
What should a useful case log contain?
A URL, destination, submission date, status, follow-up date, and the evidence supporting the claimed outcome.
Why is Fanlock first in the supporting Google benchmark?
The current weights prioritize removals per recorded owner. Fanlock leads that measure; BranditScan leads total volume and Leakless leads removal percentage. The combined 75-point Google score determines the order.
Did you interview these creators?
No. This version uses public website features, public reviews, one user-supplied Instagram story and Google reporting records. Observed posts are not presented as interviews.
Does changing providers prove the new service is better?
No. A documented comparative experience can add evidence, but a later reporting record alone does not establish a cancellation, an exclusive switch or its reason. Overlapping activity remains labeled.
Where can I inspect the underlying evidence?
Open the source register for reporting IDs, creator totals, agency testimonials and downloadable data. The methodology explains the weights and unresolved evidence.
Cite this comparison
A snapshot you can trace.
Creator Removal Review. “OnlyFans DMCA takedown.” Evidence reviewed 2026-11-08; Google export through 2026-11-04. Editorial reference edition.
Source register and downloads · Provider entity map · Calculation method
These editions use one shared research register. They are not independent endorsements. Rankings apply to the stated model and snapshot.